Caesarean section against natural childbirth
Of course any mother argue with the fact that cesarean section is equal to a natural birth does not make sense.
The connection can be achieved between a mother and a child through natural childbirth (painful or not) is incomparable. Caesarean section is an unnatural mechanism (but fortunately exists) gives an alternative way out of the baby if he fails to pass through the birth canal of the mother.
On a psychological level, therefore there is no doubt of the importance of the natural mechanism of delivery versus cesarean section. And as for the strictly medical grounds, it seems that either, as a recent study conducted in Argentina showed that cesarean section carries a much larger number of disadvantages in relation to postpartum vaginal delivery.
According to the scientists who were conducting the study, more than half of the disturbances occurred in babies born by caesarean section, which necessitated that infants were hospitalized in intensive care with oxygen.
To register this number of postpartum disorders was necessary to observe some 2,200 birth and postpartum complication rates were recorded in them.
Sure that the data provided by medicine they rely more on natural childbirth in a C-section, not to mention the psychological aspect of giving birth to a baby. The medicine always helps, and is a blessing that it exists, but it is indisputable that the natural mechanisms mean much more than her, especially in cases as significant as it is intensely childbirth.